REVIEW: Shutter Island by Dennis Lehane

by Avid Reader on October 28, 2007

in Book Reviews, Grade A Reviews, Mystery

Shut­ter Island by Den­nis Lehane is a psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller that was pub­lished way back in 2003. I bought it when it first came out but remem­bered that I  just couldn’t get into it. I chal­lenged myself to fin­ish read­ing it this year and mis­sion completed.

I was under the mis­guided impres­sion that Lehane couldn’t pos­si­bly write any­thing of inter­est for me out­side of his “Patrick/Angie books. Well, I was wrong. Shut­ter Island is a page-turner. A novel that plumbs the depths of the human psy­che.  A meaty psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller that plays with the mind with a cli­matic end­ing that was both shock­ing and quite disturbing. Yep, my kind of novel.

The course of events in this story takes place in the early 1950’s. Two Fed­eral agents, Teddy Daniels and Chuck Aule are on the ferry head­ing towards Ashe­cliffe, a prison slash med­ical facil­ity for the crim­i­nally insane located on Shut­ter Island.  Their assign­ment is to locate a miss­ing patient who is nowhere to be found on an island that is com­pletely sur­rounded by water and rock. That miss­ing patient is Rachel Solando, a war widow with a his­tory of vio­lence, who drowned her three chil­dren two years ago and who has van­ished from her locked room with­out a trace.

The inves­ti­ga­tion into Rachel’s dis­ap­pear­ance lasts four days and then the story is decid­edly over. Through­out the course of the inves­ti­ga­tion the author has set the reader up and I will not elab­o­rate on how he did this. The mood and atmos­phere of the story were down­right creepy and deli­ciously sin­is­ter. The thought of “mad sci­en­tists” prac­tic­ing their rad­i­cal ther­a­pies on unsus­pect­ing patients is a bit scary. Sec­ond, there’s a major hur­ri­cane head­ing towards the island. Teddy and Chuck find them­selves stuck on the island with no way to com­mu­ni­cate off the island while con­duct­ing their inves­ti­ga­tion. It is then that Lehane amps up the sus­pense and I couldn’t stop reading.

It’s been awhile since I’ve read a really good psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller that plays with your head. It was such a quick read, too, that I had to go back to reread the story again, armed with the insight I gained from the end­ing. Lehane hit this one out of the ball park for me. Shut­ter Island was such a grip­ping and star­tling read that I just couldn’t put it down. It’s one of those nov­els that when you reach the end you have to dis­cuss it with some­body. Thank­fully, my mother had already read this book albeit a long time ago but she remem­bered the ending!

Shut­ter Island is a story that one doesn’t soon for­get after the last page is turned. The novel really doesn’t get going until after the sec­ond or third chap­ter. The pro­logue effec­tively projects a sin­is­ter feel­ing from the start by rais­ing an aware­ness that some­thing bad has hap­pened to one of these char­ac­ters.  You just don’t know who or what or how. Lehane, for­give me. How could I have ever doubted you? My grade, A. Would I reread this book again? You bet I would. This is a book that sparks dis­cus­sion with other read­ers once it’s fin­ished. If you haven’t read it yet — you should. You won’t be dis­ap­pointed and if you are, I really don’t want to hear about it.

This book is still avail­able in paper­back and hard­cover, audio CD, cas­settes and ebook, too.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , ,

For Fur­ther Reading

{ 1 trackback }

Lehane’s Historic Epic, “The Given Day” Will Be Brought To the Big Screen | avidbookreader.com
July 11, 2008 at 3:01 am

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Avid Reader February 20, 2010 at 7:47 pm

@Sarah Glotzbach: @chris mitchell: did you all read Jill’s com­ment? I think she does a good job of explain­ing the end­ing. Also, the end­ing is not as easy for me to dis­cuss because it’s been awhile since I’ve read the book. I’m hop­ing to do a round table dis­cus­sion with some friends who did read this book and pick it apart. To not spoil it for other read­ers, I will not share my opin­ion on the the com­ment thread but you both are wel­come to email me using the con­tact form in the nav­i­ga­tion menu.

ReplyReply
Sarah Glotzbach February 19, 2010 at 9:35 pm

@chris mitchell: I want to know who he really was, it was soooo con­fus­ing. Does some­one know the answer??

ReplyReply
chris mitchell February 19, 2010 at 2:53 am

Please explain the end­ing of shut­ter island was he andrew or teddy

ReplyReply
Avid Reader January 25, 2010 at 7:58 pm

@Jill: I wouldn’t know where to start with that (laugh) but thanks for shar­ing your thoughts on the story. I was sur­prised by the end­ing but going back to read it, I did see some of the clues.

ReplyReply
Jill January 25, 2010 at 11:01 am

Okay..I just read Shut­ter Island after see­ing the movie trailer. It is indeed a great book! As much as I’d like to believe that Teddy is Teddy and Ashe­cliffe drove him to insan­ity, that’s just not the case. Teddy Daniels is the alter-ego of Andrew Laed­dis (Teddy.) The Andrew Laed­dis that is explained to us is a fab­ri­ca­tion Teddy/Andrew cre­ated to cope with the truth. Look at all the evi­dence sug­gest­ing he is Andrew. All the dreams about Dolores with a hole in her stom­ach.. about her being all wet. Teddy “fan­tasy” was that Dolores burned up in a fire. Why the hole in the stom­ach and wet­ness? I’ll tell you why.. because Dolores drowned their chil­dren in the lake (hence the wet­ness in all his dreams) and Andrew shot her in the stom­ach (hence the hole in her stom­ach) to basi­cally free her from her­self. And I guess kind of because he was angry. Think about him reit­er­at­ing their last encounter (before she drowned their chil­dren, even though we didn’t know about that part yet..) Wasn’t she act­ing a lit­tle loopy that morn­ing in the shower? She got out of the shower and was talk­ing about her “pri­vate” and said some­thing like “you can like it, kiss it, watch babies come out of it…” In Andrews fan­tasy, he and Dolores didn’t have chil­dren… that whole con­ver­sa­tion that morn­ing and espe­cially that part of it struck me odd right there. As for Sheehan’s lit­tle insert in 1993.. He did speak of the way Teddy pic­tured the island in 1954. Andrew arrived on the island in 1952. How­ever, the event that was staged to “fix” Andrew and bring him to real­ity was in 1954. He was put on a ferry with Chuck/Sheehan to begin this lit­tle shanani­gan. In that mind state, he hon­estly didn’t believe he’d been a patient on that island for the pre­vi­ous two years. I think that Dr. Caw­ley and Shee­han really cared for Andrew/Teddy.. and that sort of explains his insert in the begin­ning. Him refer­ring to Rachel Solando and Andrew Laed­dis as the twin ter­rors was again refer­ring to the four days they spent try­ing to get Andrew back to real­ity.. and Andrews belief his fan­tasy about crazy Solando and Laed­dis was true prob­a­bly did cause some havoc for those who knew the truth. Remem­ber, the creepy war­den says to him “he (refer­ring to Caw­ley, I believe) thinks what you’re doing is harm­less. I dis­agree.) I think the war­den was refer­ring to the “play” that was going on. Isn’t it sort of proof enough that the let­ters of Teddy’s name matched Andrew’s and the let­ters of Rachel’s-Dolores’s? Isn’t it proof enough that the chil­dren “Teddy” had dreamed about were the same chil­dren in the pic­tures of the crime scene? Is it not proof enough that Andrew cre­ated these fake names based off the chil­drens names? Teddy, Daniel, and Rachel? Is it not proof enough that he remem­bered every­thing in the dream he had after speak­ing with Caw­ley and Shee­han in the light­house.. details that weren’t even drilled into him dur­ing their con­ver­sa­tion in the light­house. And woke up, and admit­ted every­thing? He was folks, whether you like it or not, Andrew Laed­dis. He was never a bad guy in my opin­ion. He loved his wife, didn’t want to believe she was sick. When she killed their chil­dren, he mostly shot her to save her from her own insan­ity. He said, I believe, when he briefly came to real­ity, that if he could have gave his mind to save hers, he would have. I don’t know if Lehane meant it this way, but I’d say Andrew did indeed give his mind to save Dolores’s. Now.. I’ll admit, I was a bit con­fused about the woman in the cave, and Trey Washington’s help. I’ve decided that I do believe the woman in the cave was a fig­ment of his imag­i­na­tion. I played with the the­ory of it being staged as part of the “play.” But I thought about it a lit­tle more.. no one ever meant for Teddy to go down that cliff. Sheehan/Chuck even said that he meant for Teddy to find Laeddis’s paper where Teddy left Chuck sit­ting. It blow­ing over the cliff was an acci­dent and Shee­han even went down after it but Teddy beat him. So if Teddy was never meant to go down that cliff, he would have never seen the glow of the woman doc­tors fire.. so that was not staged… just con­ve­niently fab­ri­cated I think. As for Trey, maybe that was staged? or maybe just a bit of Andrews imagination??Or maybe Trey, like Shee­han and Caw­ley I think, really like Andrew/Teddy and wanted to help him. I still don’t think he’s a bad guy.. Not too sure, but either way.. I think it’s a small enough thing not to dwell over and it sure doesn’t prove the the­ory that Teddy’s really Teddy and the hos­pi­tal is try­ing to make him crazy. My most solid evi­dence is this.. the dreams about Dolores do not make sense until his dream about what really hap­pened. Again with the hole in the belly, and being all wet. Every­thing else just helps out. This turned out to be a long opin­ion… hope it doesn’t con­fuse peo­ple further =)

ReplyReply
Avid Reader September 20, 2009 at 11:35 pm

@har­riet stellini: What is it you don’t understand?

ReplyReply
harriet stellini September 20, 2009 at 4:01 pm

I have read Shut­ter Island and I think it is a fan­tas­tic book.… I have read the end­ing over and over and over and I just don’t get it… Could some­body please explain.

Please respond.

ReplyReply
Kaitlin October 31, 2007 at 8:11 pm

Hmmm…favorite authors. I’m sure I could dis­cuss that for HOURS, but I’ll give you a basic list. :)

Nora Roberts/JD Robb
Rachel Caine (espe­cially her Weather War­den series! Totally Rocks!)
Kim Har­ri­son
Colleen Glea­son
Nalini Singh
Mar­jorie M. Liu
Mer­cedes Lackey
Anne McCaf­frey
Lisa Kley­pas
Years by LaVyrle Spencer is one of my all-time favorite books.
The Body­guard series by Cindy Ger­ard is really good too

I have tons more. :D

ReplyReply
Avid Reader October 31, 2007 at 7:34 pm

Ms. Stacey: Lehane tricked read­ers pretty good with this one.
Vanessa: I would love to know your thoughts on this one.
Kaitlin: Wel­come! Shut­ter Island seems to not be a favorite with mys­tery fans. I so enjoyed it that I reread cer­tain parts of it, book­marked favorite scenes, talked about it with my sis­ter. You need to share some of your favorite authors!

Next up, well after a cou­ple of books, I’ll be read­ing Mys­tic River.

ReplyReply
vanessa jaye October 30, 2007 at 8:08 pm

I’ll have to check this out! Thanks for the warn­ing about the first cou­ple of chap­ters, know­ing me I would have given up.

ReplyReply
Kaitlin October 30, 2007 at 6:11 pm

Hi! I came across your blog via Romanc­ing the Blog.

I find it strange that not very many peo­ple have read this book. Both my mom & I read it and to this day I rec­om­mend it to peo­ple who like the great mind trip. :)

I’ll be read­ing your blog. I like it! :)

ReplyReply
Shannon Stacey October 29, 2007 at 9:43 pm

I thought Shut­ter Island was awe­some but, like you, I had some trou­ble get­ting into it. I ended get­ting it on unabridged audio tape and—whether it was my mood or the reader’s voice—I got sucked in. The end­ing just blew me away.

ReplyReply
Avid Reader October 29, 2007 at 12:07 pm

I haven’t read Mys­tic River but I will when I can get ahold of it. I have read his short story col­lec­tion. It’s not his best work so you’re not miss­ing anything.

ReplyReply
jenreads October 29, 2007 at 10:20 am

Yeah, this is a good one. Alas, it’s also his last novel. Have you read Mys­tic River? That’s a good one too. The guy can write no mat­ter what he choose to write about. I will admit that I haven’t read his story col­lec­tion yet though.

ReplyReply

Leave a Comment

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 873 bad guys.

Previous post:

Next post: