REVIEW: The Society of S, Susan Hubbard

by Avid Reader on April 22, 2008

in Book Reviews, Ebooks, Grade C Reviews, Horror

The Society of S by Susan HubbardThe Soci­ety of S by Susan Hub­bard reads like a mod­ern day vam­pire story and a com­ing of age story with 13 year-old Ariella Mon­tero nar­rat­ing. Is there such a thing as a lit­er­ary vam­pire novel? Ms. Hub­bard cer­tainly writes her tale in a schol­arly fash­ion but her vam­pire tale really doesn’t add any­thing “new” to a genre sat­u­rated with vam­pire lore ad nau­seum. Her prose is rather dry and the plot­ting and pac­ing was very uneven thereby mak­ing it very easy for me to put this book down.

The Soci­ety of S has a bit of Anne Rice’s “Inter­view With the Vam­pire” type of style, with Ariella gath­er­ing the answers to some of the ques­tions she’s had about her life and her fam­ily and putting them in her jour­nal. The author doesn’t write in a jour­nal­is­tic fash­ion but Ariella does at cer­tain times refer to her audi­ence with open ended questions.

Ariella has led a shel­tered life, being home schooled and hav­ing her own cook, Mrs. McGar­ritt, to pre­pare her meals for her (she’s a veg­e­tar­ian). Her par­ents are estranged. Her father is a sci­en­tist and an eru­dite who is described as being very hand­some. He is a bit of a stiff col­lar, often cit­ing the works of Edgar Alan Poe and other poets in con­ver­sa­tion. His height, pale looks and dress attire of sun glasses, trench coat and hat often leaves a last­ing impres­sion on peo­ple. Ariella says he has lupus and she her­self has some type of weak immune sys­tem so she’s rarely left her house. One day, Mrs. McGar­ritt decides to intro­duce Ariella to her fam­ily. She becomes fast friends with her daugh­ter, Kath­leen and has a roman­tic inter­est in her son, Michael.

The main story arc is about Ariella wrestling with her self-identity with a sub­plot cen­ter­ing on her find­ing her mother. There are very few super­nat­ural events in this story, because it is sim­ply not the focus. In fact, half the novel is over before you encounter any­thing “extra­or­di­nary”. There are vam­pires liv­ing amongst us and that’s noth­ing new. The story is a bit heavy handed on the sci­ence behind vam­pirism and the advanced tech­nol­ogy that has allowed this sub­cul­ture to thrive in mod­ern soci­ety. For instance, blood sup­ple­ments being used as blood sub­sti­tutes and the con­tin­u­ing research behind mak­ing arti­fi­cial blood is imper­a­tive for their sur­vival. Ariella speaks of “other” super­nat­ural beings liv­ing amongst humans and hav­ing high posi­tions in our state gov­ern­ment and sci­ence com­mu­nity. Her goal in writ­ing this jour­nal is to relay those facts to us mere mor­tals in hopes of ren­der­ing a bet­ter of under­stand­ing of the vam­pire community.

The story is very uneven and most of it is unevent­ful. Ariella’s father’s brief time at Cam­bridge was one of the few inter­est­ing parts of the book as well as the love story. There’s also a mur­der inves­ti­ga­tion that really takes a back seat to the other two story arcs. Encoun­ter­ing evil in the aca­d­e­mic set­ting is just not orig­i­nal to me and reminded me other such sto­ries that use that back­drop as well. The author goes through the usual vam­pire folk­lore, acknowl­edg­ing some of it (aver­sion to sun­light), dis­miss­ing oth­ers (shape shifters). They do have the power of invis­i­bil­ity (some­thing to do with shift­ing elec­trons) and read­ing thoughts. Her vam­pires are quite evolved. You still have a few vamps who have dis­dain for humans along with other sects of this cul­ture want­ing to just blend in unnoticed.

There’s a few flash­backs, mainly of Ariella’s father telling her what hap­pened to him at Cam­bridge and explain­ing the events that led up to her mother’s dis­ap­pear­ance after she was born. I didn’t quite buy into the ratio­nal­iza­tion of why Ariella was left when she was a baby. It just didn’t make sense to me. Ariella starts hav­ing dreams of cross­word puz­zles and other things that relates to her mother. Over the course of a sum­mer, there are sub­tle changes to Ariella that might be best described as “unusual” for a teen girl to expe­ri­ence. How­ever, her father says that her fate regard­ing her “mor­tal­ity” remains uncer­tain because since he was afflicted as a vam­pire, he’s not sure if she will become one, too.

The Soci­ety of S will not be as pop­u­lar as Stephe­nie Meyer’s vam­pires, I’m afraid. I’d have to dis­agree with Ms. Har­ris on that cover quote because the two author’s nar­ra­tive voice couldn’t be more dif­fer­ent. The reviews I’ve seen of this book so far has been pretty mixed. I’d have to side with those who found this story less than cap­ti­vat­ing. The most intrigu­ing char­ac­ter was Ariella’s father, Raphael and I wish he would have been the nar­ra­tor because his back story of run­ning across evil would have been much more inter­est­ing told from his pov. Ariella her­self was an ok nar­ra­tor but often I found her bor­ing with her knowl­edge very lim­ited for a shel­tered 13 year old.

The author doesn’t allow super­nat­ural events to over­ride the telling of a young girl’s self-discovery. The “extra­or­di­nary” is incor­po­rated into this story but, again, it is not the focus. The story is about a young girl ascert­ing her self-identity and find­ing her mother and pos­si­bly reunit­ing her par­ents. The age­less teen-age fan­tasy. The Soci­ety of S is a com­ing of age story and I’ve read my share of those and often I’ve enjoyed them. How­ever, this story just didn’t make any impres­sion on me despite the beau­ti­ful prose. The premise seemed promis­ing but it was poorly exe­cuted, IMO. My grade, C-.

For Fur­ther Reading

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Avid Reader April 25, 2008 at 4:51 pm

Ms. Gard­ner — I’m glad to know that you LOVED The Soci­ety of S, but I’d appre­ci­ate it if you would respect the fact that other peo­ple didn’t LOVE it like you did. I didn’t per­son­ally attack the author, I stated an opin­ion of her work. If you care to dis­cuss what it is you enjoyed about the book, I’d be inter­ested in read­ing your thoughts on it.

Hey Sarai, thanks.

ReplyReply
Sarai April 25, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Good Lord girl this is the sec­ond time I have seen some post a neg­a­tive comment/personal insult to you blog sim­ply because you didn’t like a par­tic­u­lar book.
I am happy that we all don’t like the same books because it give spice to life could you image if we did how bor­ing life would be.
I think you did a good review, you stated why the book didn’t work for you and what you did like about it. After all that I have say I agree I didn’t care for it either doesn’t make me a bad per­son just some­one who didn’t care for the pac­ing of the story or the char­ac­ters.
Kind of makes a per­son scared to give their thoughts on a book for fear that some­one will plan a per­sonal attack… then again bring it on I have the right to think and say what I feel about any book and so do you. Doesn’t make me a bad per­son just makes me a per­son with dif­fer­ent taste!

ReplyReply
Mary Gardner April 25, 2008 at 9:56 am

I LOVED The Soci­ety of S, and I can’t wait to read the sequel. True, it lacks the typos and vam­pire stereo­types of the Mey­ers books, but some of us actu­ally pre­fer good writ­ing to generic fluff. I’d give your review an F, and urge you to fix the gram­mat­i­cal errors before you post any more.

ReplyReply
Sarai April 23, 2008 at 4:14 pm

The rea­son I picked up this book was the back blurb sounded so inter­est­ing and some­thing dif­fer­ent. I agree that the story is noth­ing like Mey­ers and although I found some of it inter­est­ing it was a very slow read. In fact I am not sure I ever fin­ished it sim­ply due to the whole can’t keep my atten­tion moments. Her voice is pretty just not enough of any­thing to keep me mov­ing forward.

ReplyReply
Avid Reader April 23, 2008 at 9:47 am

The biggest rea­son for read­ing The Soci­ety of S was so that I could read The Year of Dis­ap­pear­ances arc that I have sit­ting on my desk. From what I’ve read/skimmed of the sequel, Ariella is with her mother and her father doesn’t show up until the mid­dle part of the book and he was the most inter­est­ing char­ac­ter in the book for me. I’d have to con­clude that the author’s voice/narrative just doesn’t work for me.

ReplyReply
Jane April 23, 2008 at 9:26 am

Not sure if my com­ment made it through, so try­ing again. I just read the sequel to this for an LJ review and felt exactly the same. In no way do I think it’d appeal to Meyer’s read­ers. Too slow and not much point to the vampireness.

ReplyReply
Avid Reader April 22, 2008 at 10:59 pm

Looks inter­est­ing, Vanessa. I’ll have to check it out. Thanks for the heads up :-)

ReplyReply
vanessa jaye April 22, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Hey, Keis­hon, I can’t remem­ber if you read steam­punk or not, but I’m read­ing some­thing now I think you’d like. Whitechapel GODS. here’s the short post I put up on it on my blog. So far, so really good.

http://​vanes​sa​jaye​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​4​/​r​e​a​d​i​n​g​.​h​tml

I know, that was rude of me. :-P To com­ment on your review, at first I saw ‘Hub­bard’ and thought it was the sci­en­tol­ogy guy so just skipped it com­pletely, but I’ve gone back and see now that it’s a dif­fer­ent author and it’s a vam­pire story (which I’m not really into with a few notable excep­tions.) The cover art is eye catch­ing though.

ReplyReply

Leave a Comment

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 851 bad guys.

Previous post:

Next post: