The Countess Trilogy (vol.2,3) by Alison Richardson

by Avid Reader on January 19, 2010

in Book Reviews, Grade B Reviews

The Count­ess Tril­ogy (2009) by Ali­son Richard­son, pub­lished by Har­le­quin, are “Spice Briefs” that are erotic short sto­ries pub­lished in “e” only. I read the first short (The Countess’s Client) and quickly wrapped up the other two sto­ries in quick suc­ces­sion (An Impo­lite Seduc­tion & The Birth­day Gift). The titles pretty much gives you an idea of what the sto­ries are about and all were enjoy­able reads. So thank you Janine.

Count­ess Anna Van Esslin is a young woman, a widow really, who now and again, indulges her sex­ual desires as she see fit. Because of her high sta­tus in soci­ety, she knows all the rules of dis­cre­tion and knows how to play the game when it comes to keep­ing her free­dom and enjoy­ing her sex­ual exploits sans scandal.

Well, the Count­ess makes a few mis­steps. First, she skirts close to scan­dal when she decides to play the “whore” to a Scot­tish philoso­pher and sci­en­tist, James McKir­nan in The Countess’s Client. Need­less to say, her low­born admirer dared expected more than his sta­tus allowed when he asked her to be his mis­tress and then his wife. Of course she turns him down (the nerve!) at every turn but James isn’t giv­ing up at all. He’s very con­fi­dent and a strong rival. The two are well matched.

I was often amused at what James had up his sleeve in order to win Anna’s favor. He annoys her at every turn with his under­hand­ed­ness. He wants to marry her but she con­tin­ues to refuse him and thus he becomes her adver­sar­ial suitor. Anna views mar­riage to a com­moner as some kind of night­mare sit­u­a­tion that doesn’t even bear think­ing about. So James has a bat­tle on his hands when it comes to mak­ing the Count­ess over­look his social sta­tus despite the fact that he seems to please her in the bedroom.

In “An Impo­lite Seduc­tion,” has both James and Anna schem­ing and trump­ing each other. All I can say is that in this entry, Anna gets the bet­ter of James in this go round. She ends up him hav­ing him exiled but they meet in again in the only place that he can call home: Munich.

The con­clu­sion of the tril­ogy, The Birth­day Present, caps a some­what HEA of sorts to the chase that began in Paris some eleven years ago and ends in Munich. I liked the end­ing although it is uncon­ven­tional. The premise for “The Birth­day Present” has the Count­ess gifted with a secret lover for her “birth­day present” after two years of celibacy and she doesn’t know who it is.

Surely it can’t be James, can it? There’s sev­eral good rea­sons why it’s not James. First, James speaks appallingly bad French and her secret lover speaks elo­quently. And sec­ond, her cousin Robert, who gave her her birth­day present despises James as much as much she does so… who is he? Who is this man who makes her body sing and makes her yearn for his touch?

The last story was more roman­tic with an added bit of dan­ger. Once again, the Count­ess makes a mis­step that endan­gers the man she loves (ok she hates to admit it but she does love him). I just knew there had to be some type of major event to make her come to her senses. Any­way. Highly rec­om­mend this tril­ogy and thanks again to Janine and Wendy (who also enjoyed this series as well). B+.

For Fur­ther Reading

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Avid Reader January 21, 2010 at 10:43 am

@Evan­ge­line: Oh, me too. Tal­ented writer of that we all agree. Like I was telling Janine, I’m glad she didn’t change her snob­bish ways when they reached the end of the road.

ReplyReply
Evangeline January 21, 2010 at 8:01 am

This book was all voice for me. Though the premises were obvi­ously super sexy, Richardson’s writ­ing was much more inter­est­ing to me than the sex. And I loved Anna–we need more snob­bish hero­ines in romance. I always find it dif­fi­cult to believe that no wealthy and/or titled hero­ine had no sense of entitlement–hence why Lady Freyja Bed­wyn is the only Balogh hero­ine I’ve loved. Hope­fully Richard­son isn’t a one-shot author as I’d love to see what she could do with a full-length novel.

ReplyReply
Janine January 20, 2010 at 4:02 pm

@Avid Reader: You’re wel­come, Keis­hon. I had such fun review­ing this tril­ogy. Agree with you that it was good that Anna stayed true to her­self, and only soft­ened a little.

I haven’t been able to find out any­thing about Ali­son Richard­son online and I have no idea what else she may have in the works, but I too hope there’s some­thing. I agree with Wendy about her writ­ing — it’s very enter­tain­ing and has a way of draw­ing you in.

ReplyReply
Avid Reader January 20, 2010 at 10:42 am

@Janine: Unlik­able hero­ines — they are refresh­ing. Anna stayed true to her char­ac­ter through to the end which was what I liked as well. I hope Ms. Richard­son has other sto­ries to share with us. I was very impressed with this tril­ogy of hers and thanks again Janine.

ReplyReply
Janine January 20, 2010 at 2:51 am

I’m so glad you enjoyed this tril­ogy, Keis­hon. And what a fab­u­lous, funny review this is.

Anna was a total snob, but you know, I still liked her because (A) she knew what she wanted and went after it, (B) she was clever, and (C ) her nar­ra­tion was a hoot. Also, I get tired some­times of romance hero­ines being so “sym­pa­thetic” — kind to orphans, ser­vants and those in need of heal­ing. Anna was a change of pace and that in itself was refreshing.

ReplyReply
Avid Reader January 19, 2010 at 9:46 am

Hi Wendy, I com­pletely over­looked Anna’s char­ac­ter as I think she was more in LUST than in love and her dis­dain was pretty strong. I was won over more by James though and the author’s writ­ing was good. I did think James really loved her and was moved when you know, she had to come to his aid. They cer­tainly deserved each other on that we can agree. I would cat­e­go­rize them as an odd cou­ple from com­pletely dif­fer­ent worlds who have some things in com­mon, moreso in the bed­room though. But this was the best of the tril­ogy. Read­ers who enjoy erotic sto­ries should read her hence the higher grade. Yes, I would read these again.

ReplyReply
Wendy January 19, 2010 at 8:59 am

Heh — except I graded this tril­ogy on the lower end of the spec­trum. I wasn’t really con­vinced these char­ac­ters deserved a happy end­ing — although I guess they both deserved each other :)

What struck me most was the writ­ing. I really fell into Richardson’s writ­ing. Nor­mally when I’m con­flicted about the char­ac­ters in a series, I don’t nec­es­sar­ily “come back for more.” I did here.

ReplyReply

Leave a Comment

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 834 bad guys.

Previous post:

Next post: